Digestive Diseases News
Fall 2009
Radiofrequency Ablation Effectively
Treats Barrett’s Esophagus
 Esophageal tissue before and after radiofrequency ablation. Barrett’s tissue appears bright pink; normal tissue appears pale pink.
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), a
technique involving the use of endoscopically
controlled electric probes,
effectively removes precancerous cells of
the esophagus, according to a study funded
by BÂRRX Medical with partial support
from the National Institute of Diabetes and
Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK).
The multicenter trial showed that more than
75 percent of participants with Barrett’s
esophagus who were treated with RFA were
free of precancerous cells after 1 year, compared
with 2.3 percent of controls who received a sham
procedure.
“Our data show that most patients who were
treated with radiofrequency ablation had complete
eradication of intestinal metaplasia and
dysplasia and a decreased risk of disease progression
at 12 months,” wrote Nicholas J. Shaheen,
M.D., M.P.H., director of the Center for
Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University
of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and co-authors
in a report that appeared in the May 28 issue of
The New England Journal of Medicine.
Intestinal metaplasia occurs when normal
esophageal epithelial cells—the cells that line
the esophagus—are replaced with cells similar to
those of the large and small intestines. Dysplasia
refers to the presence of precancerous cells.
Increasing Problem
The incidence of esophageal carcinoma, a cancer
of the esophagus that is difficult to detect and
treat, has increased dramatically during the
past 30 years. Scientists believe the increase is
tied to rising rates of gastroesophageal reflux
disease (GERD), a condition that occurs when
stomach contents rise into the esophagus. Some
gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is normal, but
when it occurs too often, it can cause intestinal
metaplasia, also known as Barrett’s tissue. The
resulting condition, Barrett’s esophagus, can lead
to dysplasia and esophageal cancer. The reason
for the rise in GERD is unclear; however, risk
factors include being obese, Caucasian, male, and
older than 40.
A small fraction of people with Barrett’s esophagus
develop esophageal carcinoma. Risk corresponds
to the degree of dysplasia, which is
graded through biopsy of endoscopically
obtained esophageal tissue.
Standard care for people with Barrett’s esophagus
involves monitoring dysplasia through endoscopy
and biopsy of esophageal tissue. If high-grade
dysplasia is detected, Barrett’s tissue is often
removed using one of several therapies, including
surgical removal of the affected section of the
esophagus, called esophagectomy, and photodynamic
light therapy, which uses lasers to destroy
cells that are made light sensitive with drugs
called photosensitizers.
Because most people with Barrett’s esophagus will
never develop esophageal cancer, debate continues
about when patients should receive treatment and
which treatment is safest and most effective.
“Despite the large number of patients with
Barrett’s esophagus and the remarkable increase
in the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in
the past 30 years,” wrote Shaheen and colleagues,
“the optimal management strategy for dysplastic
Barrett’s esophagus has not been defined.”
RFA
RFA uses an electrode to heat and kill dysplastic
cells. Used for years to treat other conditions,
RFA has only recently been adapted to treat
Barrett’s esophagus.
Shaheen and colleagues enrolled 127 patients
with either high- or low-grade dysplasia of the
esophagus in a study and randomized them to
either an ablation group that received up to four
ablation sessions or a control group that received
a sham procedure. During the study, all participants
took the drug esomeprazole—a drug used
to control GER symptoms.
Devices used to perform the ablation included a
specially designed endoscopic balloon, wrapped
with an electrode array, and a focal RFA device.
Both devices are made by BÂRRX Medical.
The balloon ablation device is designed to treat
large sections of affected esophagus, whereas the
focal ablation device is designed to treat smaller
patches of tissue.
To monitor dysplasia, biopsies were conducted
at several time points over a period of 1 year.
Biopsied tissues were collected from multiple
areas in the esophagus. Pathologists judged
dysplasia using standardized criteria.
Important Implications
After 1 year, among participants in the ablation
group with initially low-grade dysplasia,
90.5 percent were free of dysplasia, compared
with 22.7 percent of controls. Among those in
the ablation group with high-grade dysplasia,
81 percent were free of dysplasia, compared with
19 percent of controls. Intestinal metaplasia
was absent in 77.4 percent of participants who
received ablation, regardless of dysplasia grade,
compared with 2.3 percent of all controls. Controls were more likely to experience disease
progression, as measured by dysplasia, and had a
higher rate of esophageal cancer development. The
occurrence of adverse events among participants in
the ablation and control groups was similar.
“This study has important implications for
the treatment of high-grade dysplasia in
patients with Barrett’s esophagus,” wrote
Jacques Bergman, M.D., Ph.D., Department of
Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic
Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,
in a companion editorial. Based on the results of
this study, according to Bergman, RFA is more
effective than photodynamic light therapy and
much safer than esophagectomy.
Despite positive results that RFA is safe and
effective, a randomized comparison of endoscopic
surveillance and RFA is needed to define
factors that influence treatment response and
to determine if RFA is durable and improves
patients’ quality of life, according to Bergman.
“Such a study might truly revolutionize the
management of this condition and answer the
question as to whether radiofrequency ablation is
great just for some or justified for many.”
The NIDDK has information about Barrett’s
esophagus and GERD. Visit www.digestive.niddk.nih.gov for free fact sheets and easy-to-read
booklets about these and other digestive
diseases.
[Top] [Next Article]
NIH Publication No. 10–4552
October 2009
|